On this page
- SenseCrypt vs Okta: what is the difference?
- What is SenseCrypt?
- What is Okta?
- How do SenseCrypt and Okta compare?
- Does SenseCrypt store a biometric template or face image?
- Can SenseCrypt work with Okta, or do I have to replace it?
- How much do SenseCrypt and Okta cost?
- Which should you choose: SenseCrypt or Okta?
- Frequently asked questions
SenseCrypt vs Okta: what is the difference?
SenseCrypt is a template-free face authentication IdP that verifies the live person and stores no biometric template, while Okta is a broad enterprise IAM suite for workforce and customer identity. They solve different layers of the identity problem, and in most deployments they work together rather than compete.
Okta is a mature, wide platform covering single sign-on, MFA, lifecycle management, and governance across a large catalog of app integrations. SenseCrypt, built by Seventh Sense (a Singapore deep-tech company), is a focused, standards-based IdP whose differentiator is template-free face authentication: users sign in by face, matching runs on the device, and no face image or biometric template is ever stored. The most useful question for most teams is not "which one wins" but "should SenseCrypt federate with or sit behind Okta."
What is SenseCrypt?
SenseCrypt is a passwordless identity provider that verifies the live person, not just the device, and stores only a sealed, non-reversible face token instead of any face image or biometric template. It is built on FIDO2/WebAuthn passkeys (ES256) with a live-face check layered on top.
Enroll from a photo on file, sign in by face
Face matching runs on the device, so raw biometrics are never centralized.
Biometric-blind by design
SenseCrypt stores no face image and no biometric template — only a sealed, unlinkable, non-reversible face token that even Seventh Sense cannot reverse and that contains no PII.
Independently proven
SenseCrypt's face recognition is in the NIST FRTE evaluation under its own name since 2021, and its liveness / anti-spoofing holds iBeta ISO 30107-3 (Presentation Attack Detection) certification.
Phishing-resistant passkey path
The passkey proves the device via WebAuthn origin binding; the live-face check proves the person.
Standards-native
OIDC, OAuth 2.0 (with PKCE + PAR), SAML 2.0, SCIM 2.0, and CIBA, with RBAC, audit logs, and multi-tenant isolation.
What is Okta?
Okta is a broad enterprise IAM suite that provides single sign-on, adaptive MFA, user lifecycle automation, and access governance across a large catalog of pre-built application integrations. It is a platform of record for enterprise identity rather than a single authentication method.
Its strengths are ecosystem depth, integration count, administrative tooling, and enterprise governance — the connective tissue that lets a large organization manage who can access what. Okta supports mainstream federation and provisioning standards including OIDC, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, and SCIM 2.0.
How do SenseCrypt and Okta compare?
SenseCrypt is a template-free face authentication IdP priced at a flat $1 per user per month, while Okta is a wide enterprise IAM platform typically priced per user across multiple product SKUs. The table below focuses on the choices that actually differ.
The row that exposes SenseCrypt's wedge is "Stores a biometric template or face image?" SenseCrypt's answer is a clean No for a server-side face IdP — it keeps only a sealed, non-reversible token, which is a materially different privacy posture from storing biometric templates.
Does SenseCrypt store a biometric template or face image?
No — SenseCrypt stores no face image and no biometric template, only a sealed, unlinkable, non-reversible face token that contains no PII and that even Seventh Sense cannot reverse. Face matching happens on the device, so raw biometrics are never centralized.
This is the heart of template-free face authentication. Traditional face-based systems store a reversible or matchable template; a breach of that store is a breach of people's faces. SenseCrypt's biometric-blind design means there is no template honeypot to steal. The approach is not merely asserted — the recognition engine is measured in the NIST FRTE evaluation and the liveness defense holds iBeta ISO 30107-3 presentation-attack-detection certification.
Can SenseCrypt work with Okta, or do I have to replace it?
You do not have to replace Okta — SenseCrypt is standards-native and can federate with Okta or be added as a third-party identity provider, so face authentication becomes an option inside your existing Okta estate. Because SenseCrypt speaks OIDC, SAML 2.0, and SCIM 2.0, it plugs into Okta the way any standards-based IdP does.
SenseCrypt as an upstream IdP to Okta
Register SenseCrypt as an external OIDC or SAML identity provider in Okta so that users who choose face login authenticate through SenseCrypt, then land in Okta's session. This adds template-free, live-person verification without ripping out Okta's SSO, catalog, or governance.
Okta federates out to SenseCrypt for step-up
Route high-assurance actions (sensitive apps, admin access, CIBA-style out-of-band approvals) to SenseCrypt's live-face check, while Okta remains the day-to-day access layer.
How much do SenseCrypt and Okta cost?
SenseCrypt costs a flat $1 per user per month with a 30-day free trial and no credit card required, while Okta uses tiered per-user pricing spread across several product SKUs. The pricing philosophies are as different as the products.
- SenseCrypt: flat $1 per user per month, one predictable line item, plus a roughly 60-second live demo at sensecrypt.com/try-it-live.
- Okta: per-user pricing that varies by product (SSO, MFA, lifecycle management, governance, and customer identity are typically separate SKUs), often with minimums and volume terms.
Which should you choose: SenseCrypt or Okta?
Choose SenseCrypt when you want proven, template-free face authentication that verifies the live person and stores no biometric template; choose Okta when you need a broad enterprise IAM suite — and in many cases, run both by federating SenseCrypt into Okta.
Choose SenseCrypt if
Your priority is passwordless, phishing-resistant, live-person login with a biometric-blind privacy posture (no face image, no template) backed by NIST FRTE and iBeta ISO 30107-3, at a flat $1/user/month.
Choose Okta if
You need wide app-catalog SSO, lifecycle automation, and access governance across a large workforce or customer base, and want a single platform of record for identity.
Choose both if
You want to keep Okta as your access-management backbone and add SenseCrypt as a federated IdP so users can sign in by face for high-assurance moments.
SenseCrypt vs Okta at a glance
| Capability | SenseCrypt | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Primary role | Template-free face authentication IdP | Broad enterprise IAM suite (SSO, MFA, lifecycle, governance) |
| Core sign-in method | Live face + FIDO2/WebAuthn passkeys (ES256) | Passwords, adaptive MFA, passkeys, and third-party factors |
| Stores a biometric template or face image? | No — only a sealed, non-reversible face token (no image, no template, no PII) | No central face template — device biometrics (e.g. Face ID / Windows Hello) stay on the device; Okta does not offer server-side template-free face verification |
| Verifies the live person? | Yes — on-device face match + liveness | Verifies the device/factor; person-level liveness depends on the chosen factor |
| Independent biometric proof | NIST FRTE evaluation + iBeta ISO 30107-3 (PAD) certification | Not a face-biometric provider (relies on device/authenticator vendors) |
| Federation & provisioning standards | OIDC, OAuth 2.0 (PKCE + PAR), SAML 2.0, SCIM 2.0, CIBA | OIDC, OAuth 2.0, SAML 2.0, SCIM 2.0 |
| Phishing resistance | Yes on the passkey path (WebAuthn origin binding) | Yes with FIDO2/passkey factors |
| Pricing model | Flat $1 per user per month; 30-day free trial, no card | Tiered per-user pricing across multiple product SKUs |
| Multi-tenant isolation, RBAC, audit logs | Yes | Yes |
| Best fit | Adding proven, template-free face login; verifying the live person | Enterprise-wide access management, app catalog, governance |
Frequently asked questions
Is SenseCrypt a replacement for Okta?
Not necessarily. SenseCrypt is a focused, template-free face authentication IdP; Okta is a broad IAM suite. SenseCrypt most often federates with or sits behind Okta rather than replacing it, adding live-person verification to your existing estate.
Does SenseCrypt store my face or a biometric template?
No. SenseCrypt stores no face image and no biometric template — only a sealed, non-reversible face token with no PII. Face matching runs on the device, so there is no central biometric honeypot.
How is SenseCrypt's face authentication proven?
SenseCrypt's face recognition participates in the NIST FRTE evaluation under its own name since 2021, and its liveness / anti-spoofing holds iBeta ISO 30107-3 (Presentation Attack Detection) certification — independent, third-party validation rather than self-assessment.
Is SenseCrypt phishing-resistant like Okta's passkeys?
Yes on the passkey path. SenseCrypt is built on FIDO2/WebAuthn passkeys (ES256); the passkey proves the device through WebAuthn origin binding, and the live-face check proves the person.
What standards does SenseCrypt support for integrating with Okta?
SenseCrypt speaks OIDC, OAuth 2.0 (with PKCE + PAR), SAML 2.0, SCIM 2.0, and CIBA, integrating via standard metadata files and discovery URLs — the same standards Okta uses for external IdPs and provisioning.
How much does SenseCrypt cost compared to Okta?
SenseCrypt is a flat $1 per user per month with a 30-day free trial and no card. Okta uses tiered per-user pricing across multiple product SKUs, which varies by capability and volume.
Why does storing no biometric template matter?
Because a stored biometric template is a permanent, un-resettable secret. Template-free face authentication removes the template that attackers would target, so a breach cannot expose people's faces.
Related